Showing posts with label State Library of NSW. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State Library of NSW. Show all posts

Reference @ the Metcalfe 9th May 2019

An unexpected theme emerged from the different speakers during the day. It began in the form of social justice issues and disappearing reference desks, promoted by Kate Adler and Ian Beilin, University librarians from the US who read sections of their newly published book – Reference librarianship and justice: History, practice and Praxis.

History Week Goes Pop!

Hashtags, Heroines, and Histories: Popular Culture in History

Steph B.
.
Between 2 and 10 September 2017, over 80 events were staged across the state as part of the History Council of NSW’s annual flagship event, History Week. Now in its 20th year, History Week aims to ‘engage a range of audiences by showcasing the rich, diverse history being produced by organisations and individuals across New South Wales.’
Each year, the History Council assigns a particular theme to History Week for participating institutions and individuals to use as both their inspiration and focus. In 2017 History Week went ‘Pop!’ -  or rather, as their website explains – members were ‘invited to celebrate popular culture across the decades, to investigate its construction and analyse its impact on communities and individuals.’ This was a really fun premise and I’m kicking myself that I didn’t do as I did in 2016, which was to take the entire week off as annual leave, book myself into a swanky hotel in the city and attend as many events as humanly possible. Lesson learnt for next year.
But one event I was fortunate enough to attend was an afternoon symposium at the State Library of NSW called Hashtags, Heroines and Histories: Popular Culture in History. And the blurb?...
The Department of Modern History, Macquarie University, in conjunction with the Centre for Media History and the Centre of Applied History, present a symposium that explores the different ways popular culture is and can be used in historical research. Presenters will investigate not only the history of popular culture, but also how different cultural texts both shape and are shaped by political and social forces. In a landscape where presidential tweets can act as official statements, where #blacklivesmatter and diversity of gender and racial representation has taken on increasing significance, asking questions of the political and cultural possibilities and limits of popular culture is as important as ever.

So, fuelled with strong black coffee from the library’s onsite café, I settled in with my notepad and pen for what I hoped would be a fascinating afternoon indulging in what is – for me at least – one of life’s great pleasures, namely listening to frighteningly clever, articulate and thought-provoking historians and researchers present papers on their individual areas of historical investigation, followed by lively audience discussions, and more coffee. A quick glance at program indicated that I was not about to be disappointed. Indeed, I think that the final speaker of the day, Dr Leigh Boucher from Macquarie University, had perhaps one of the most intriguing titles for a presentation I have ever come across (see below). The line-up consisted of:
  • Professor Kate Darian-Smith, University of Melbourne – Connecting Histories of Television and Histories of Migration
  • Catherine Fisher, Australian National University – Fighting Soap: Australian Women Broadcasters and Post-war Citizenship
  • Dr Scott McKinnon, University of Wollongong – Out on Screen and In the Audience: Sydney’s Gay History as Told Through the City’s Movie Theatres
  • Professor Bronwyn Carlson, Macquarie University – The Global Call to Action: #SOSBLAKAUSTRALIA
  • Dr Jodi McAlister, University of Tasmania – Modern Love in Period Clothing: The History of Romance via Historical Romance
  • Dr Rebecca Sheehan, Macquarie University – Rock the Cradle of Love: Pop Music and the Making of Sexual Consent
  • Dr Leigh Boucher, Macquarie University – Crying Footballers and the Affective Associations of Neoliberal Despair
I won’t go into detail regarding the content of each speaker’s paper as I do understand that most are probably not as interested in the historical dissertations of a group of academic smarty-pants as I am - see me later if you are - but I will mention a few things that this symposium highlighted:
  • Collecting, preserving and making accessible documents and records which cover a wide range of subjects and in numerous formats is so important. We have no idea what use future researchers might want to use these items for, but without them large, significant and diverse pieces of our history could go unexplored or, at best, will be under-represented.
  • Surprising and enlightening stories can be found when we look at things from a different angle. Do you remember that scene in the film Dead Poets Society when the Robin Williams character instructs his students to stand on their desks in order to get an alternative view of things? Well, that’s what it felt like listening to many of the presenters at the Pop! symposium. By linking seemingly unrelated aspects of Australian history – like post-war migration and the birth of television; or Sydney’s gay history with that of movie theatres; or even how sports coverage today often focuses more on the losing team than the winning, and what lines can be drawn between this and the Neoliberal man (!!!) – new and illuminating concepts come to life.
  • It is essential to allow time and the opportunity for conferring at conferences. The clue is in the name – although to be fair, this was a symposium rather than a conference. Never-the-less, historical study doesn’t (or shouldn’t) happen in a vacuum and there is often a lot of value - both for the speaker and members of the audience - in questioning and discussing points raised in presentations.
  • There are some very clever people out there doing some amazing work!
  • I’ll definitely be watching the AFL Grand Final with a different eye this weekend – especially when it comes to the sobbing losers at the final siren. 
Thanks, Steph B.

Beyond the Physical: Reimagining Digital Experiences in Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums.

On 27 May 2016 the State Library of NSW hosted a forum presented by CSIRO Data61 in which a panel of specialists working in GLAM institutions (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) discussed and demonstrated how they are developing and utilising new technologies in order to connect and engage with the public in new and innovative ways. As the blurb stated:

Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAM) have always been a place of wonder, discovery, knowledge and memories. With new technologies now available, and the realm of digital information, the wonder only expands: space barriers are broken down and artefacts can be experienced and explored remotely.

The speakers on the forum were:
  •  Brenden Somes - Collection Strategy Specialist, State Library of NSW
  • George Dunford – Head of Digital and Content Services, National Museum of Australia
  • Daniel Keogh – Educational Games Designer, 3P Learning
  • Dr Lynda Kelly – Head of Learning, Australian National Maritime Museum
  • Dr John La Salle – Director, Atlas of Living Australia
  • Crispin Howarth – Curator Pacific Arts, National Gallery of Australia
  • Gavin Walker – Leading Data Integration, CSIRO Data61

The State Library of NSW has always collected what Brenden Somes rather technically calls ‘stuff’. This stuff covers a wide variety of subjects and is collected for the purpose of documenting life in NSW and to provide information and services for the public both today and into the future. In the past this has largely meant the collecting of physical objects such as newspapers, photographs, magazines, monographs, diaries, maps etc. However, the State Library has become increasingly interested in how daily life is recorded in the digital world and they have therefore been working with the CSIRO Data61 since 2012 to collect social media.
To do this, the State Library uses a program called Vizie which collects content from publicly available social media following a set of library generated parameters. Spreadsheets are created and Vizie ingests this content and initiates the process of collecting. For example, in 2015 the State Library collected social media data on the NSW State election (the political parties; their digital presence; how social media reacted to news and events, etc.) The State Library of NSW is able to collect social media on a grand scale - the challenge now is to negotiate how this data can best be accessed by library users.                                          
Australian museums and cultural spaces are also looking to technology to help find answers to other challenges. The National Museum of Australia (NMA), the Australian National Maritime Museum (ANMM), and even Jenolan Caves are investing heavily in their digital outreach programs which are designed to create connections with people, particularly students who, for whatever reason (distance, physical disability etc), are unable to visit their institutions in person.
The NMA is now home to the Museum Robot, ‘a semi-autonomous robot that operates as a guide to
Chesster (left) and Kasparov © National Museum of Australia 
remotely connected users’ and endeavours to emulate the experience of being on a physical tour of the museum. The robot wanders around the museum whilst a guide talks to the robot and gives a tour to up to 15 different ‘audiences’ at any one time, including overseas ‘visitors’. Unfortunately, as many remote audiences do not have access to the high level of broadband required, the NMA is currently limited who it can connect with. The Museum Robot is also a very expensive piece of equipment and beyond the price range of many institutions. Cheaper versions of robot avatars (basically a remotely operated tablet on a stick) are available for about $2000 - $3000. The disadvantages are that they take several hours to charge, have no collision avoidance and are somewhat unstable.

GLAM institutions are also using digital technology to expand accessibility in other ways. The National Museum of Australia holds more than 200,000 objects in its National Historical Collection yet, like most museums and galleries, they only display about 3-5% of their physical collection. The NMA has therefore developed their ‘Collection Explorer’ which allows access to almost half of these items over the web. Additionally, when a physical exhibition is over, a digitised collection can continue to be accessible - and added to – online.
The Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) is also making more and more of their collection accessible online. For ALA this is more than just an outreach program – it is a complete reimagining of Australian biological collections (there are currently around 60 million specimens in Australian collections). ALA is working to produce a fully digitised, support-based collection which not only allows researchers to view insects more closely than ever before, but to perform scientific analysis and record precise data which will help future decision-making regarding nature, the environment and sustainability.
Yangoru Boiken drum head © National Gallery of Australia
Throughout this forum it was repeatedly emphasised by the speakers that they did not see digital innovation as a means to replace the physical experience of visiting GLAM institutions, but to enhance it. The Pacific Art collection at the National Gallery of Australia holds many items from Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia but, like the NMA, only a small fraction is physically exhibited, often in dark, didactic settings which restricts how close visitors can get to their artworks. The curators wanted to highlight the craftsmanship of the objects and thereby make their physical exhibitions more engaging. This was achieved by scanning the objects in 3D and then attaching touch-screen panels to the appropriate display cases. Curator, Crispin Howarth, did concede that many people, especially children, were more interested in the digital displays than the physical objects, but by tracking visitors they could see that many then did return to ‘the real thing’ with a more informed understanding of the exhibit.

The speakers highlighted several other advantages they have found from digitising their collections, particularly with regards to preservation, collaboration and education. Interestingly, innovative technology can also assist curators well before a physical exhibition comes to life. Using virtual reality, curators can show colleagues – and even investors or sponsors - what a planned exhibition could be like before putting it together. Being able to ‘walk through’ a virtual version of the exhibition can help those, who Crispin Howarth called, ‘the geo-spatially challenged’ have a clearer idea of the layout and design of an exhibition long before objects are put on show.
Jenolan Caves © IntoScience
Even Jenolan Caves is getting in on the act. Daniel Keogh from 3P Learning/Into Science has a background in gaming, and these days works to ‘produce educational games and interactive content to teach high school students about wondrous stuff in science.’ Using a Zebedee 3D scanner Daniel’s team is creating a virtual 3D experience of Jenolan Caves – one in which students can explore, ‘take samples’ and undertake ‘experiments’. The digital experience can also tell the history and science of the caves – and if it’s online, in theory, it’s available anywhere in the world. Daniel has also worked with the Australian National Maritime Museum to create a 3D ‘replica’ of the HMS Endeavour.
Of course these virtual versions cannot reproduce many of the attributes of the ‘real thing’- the smells, changes in temperature, the experience of how others around you are reacting to the physical environment, – at least not yet, but the digital landscape is opening up the opportunity for GLAM institutions to connect and interact with both physical and remote visitors in ways which not so long ago were science fiction.
Cheers, Steph Bailey. :)